China's Provincial Households - Revision history

AltheaDitter: Blanked the page

2017-04-17T14:55:32Z

Blanked the page

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:55, 17 April 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	China's provincial household data came from the [[China_Statistical_Yearbooks\|China Statistical Yearbooks]] 2012-2015, which produced a series that runs from 2011-2014. There is household data published in the 2016 yearbook, but this data was not included because it is significantly different from the preceding years by twice the households in some provinces. There was not a reason for this inconsistency that was found in the China Statistical Yearbooks' metadata.

	~~[[File:Householdsize v728.jpg]]~~



	There is also data available that was created by the Chinese census that was received as a part of the China Data Center database. This data was chosen to not be included in the model because the most recent data was in 2010, which is more dated than the China Statistical Yearbooks' data. This data could not be blended with the China Statistical Yearbook data because there is a siginificant (approximately 3 million households) jump between 2010 (the end of the census data) and 2011 (the beginning of the China Statistical Yearbook data).

AltheaDitter at 21:19, 14 April 2017

2017-04-14T21:19:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:19, 14 April 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	China's provincial household data came from the [[China_Statistical_Yearbooks\|China Statistical Yearbooks]] 2012-2015, which produced a series that runs from 2011-2014. There is household data published in the 2016 yearbook, but this data was not included because it is significantly different from the preceding years by ~~about 3 million~~ households in some provinces. There was not a reason for this inconsistency that was found in the China Statistical Yearbooks' metadata.		China's provincial household data came from the [[China_Statistical_Yearbooks\|China Statistical Yearbooks]] 2012-2015, which produced a series that runs from 2011-2014. There is household data published in the 2016 yearbook, but this data was not included because it is significantly different from the preceding years by twice the households in some provinces. There was not a reason for this inconsistency that was found in the China Statistical Yearbooks' metadata.

			[[File:Householdsize v728.jpg]]


	~~the first series~~ that was ~~used came from~~ the Chinese census ~~out~~ of the China Data Center database. ~~It need an update and I found a new series that had~~ more ~~recent~~ data. ~~However, we~~ could not ~~use a~~ blended ~~series because~~ the data ~~was significantly different~~ (~3 million households ~~in some provinces~~)~~. Because~~ of ~~this incongruent~~ data~~, I opted to use~~ the ~~new series that has more recent data instead~~ of the ~~census~~ data.
			There is also data available that was created by the Chinese census that was received as a part of the China Data Center database. This data was chosen to not be included in the model because the most recent data was in 2010, which is more dated than the China Statistical Yearbooks' data. This data could not be blended with the China Statistical Yearbook data because there is a siginificant (approximately 3 million households) jump between 2010 (the end of the census data) and 2011 (the beginning of the China Statistical Yearbook data).

AltheaDitter at 21:09, 14 April 2017

2017-04-14T21:09:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:09, 14 April 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	China's provincial household data came from the [[China_Statistical_Yearbooks\|China Statistical Yearbooks]]		China's provincial household data came from the [[China_Statistical_Yearbooks\|China Statistical Yearbooks]] 2012-2015, which produced a series that runs from 2011-2014. There is household data published in the 2016 yearbook, but this data was not included because it is significantly different from the preceding years by about 3 million households in some provinces. There was not a reason for this inconsistency that was found in the China Statistical Yearbooks' metadata.



	the first series that was used came from the Chinese census out of the China Data Center database. It need an update and I found a new series that had more recent data. However, we could not use a blended series because the data was significantly different (~3 million households in some provinces). Because of this incongruent data, I opted to use the new series that has more recent data instead of the census data.		the first series that was used came from the Chinese census out of the China Data Center database. It need an update and I found a new series that had more recent data. However, we could not use a blended series because the data was significantly different (~3 million households in some provinces). Because of this incongruent data, I opted to use the new series that has more recent data instead of the census data.

AltheaDitter: Created page with "China's provincial household data came from the China Statistical Yearbooks the first series that was used came from the Chinese census out of..."

2017-04-14T20:55:57Z

Created page with "China's provincial household data came from the China Statistical Yearbooks the first series that was used came from the Chinese census out of..."

New page

China's provincial household data came from the [[China_Statistical_Yearbooks|China Statistical Yearbooks]]

the first series that was used came from the Chinese census out of the China Data Center database. It need an update and I found a new series that had more recent data. However, we could not use a blended series because the data was significantly different (~3 million households in some provinces). Because of this incongruent data, I opted to use the new series that has more recent data instead of the census data.