EconDash

The EconDash is a set of interactive data visualizations created by the Frederick S. Pardee Center for International Futures. The purpose of these visualizations is to allow the user to explore and better understand relevant indicators of financial and economic instability and resilience. EconDash uses both monadic and dyadic data across time, and includes some forecasted variables from the International Futures (IFs) system. There is currently one public user interface available from EconDash that explores Trade Networks. A new Economic Vulnerability interface will be available by late summer 2017.

EconDash: Trade Networks Interface

This dashboard focuses on trade networks from 1960 to 2014 and the centrality of countries in these networks. It also contains data on financial crises over the same time period. To access the dashboard click here.

Navigating the Interface

The EconDash interface allows users to display and explore financial and economic crises and global trade networks along a variety of dimensions. Figure 1 is an

Figure 1: EconDash Annotated Main Display Page

annotated view of the main display page with its default settings. It provides definitions and instructions on each of the page's functions. On this page, the user can select the independent variables that determine: 1) the size of the bubbles that represent each country ("Select country size"); 2) the bubbles' color scheme ("Select country color"); 3) the network that is represented by the links (grey lines) between countries ("Select network"); and 4) the value threshold over which network links should be displayed for the selected network variable ("Show connections"). One can also select the year of the data that will be displayed ("Select year"). Currently, data is available from 1960 to 2014. In addition, the interface provides information about the selected independent variables in the textual display on the right and in graphs at the bottom of the screen. One can access country-specific information about

Figure 2: Mouse-over Country Display Example

selected variables by mousing over each country bubble (see Figure 2). Information about the network variable for two countries (country dyads) can be viewed by mousing over the grey line linking them (see Figure 3). Generally, the most meaningful stories emerge when two or more of the selected variables represents the same category of information. For example, one could gain a better understanding of the world's energy trade networks and how they relate to economic sophisitaction (as measured by GDP per capita) by selecting "GDPPCP" for country size, "centrality score energy (percent)" for country color, "total energy trade" for network, and experimenting with connection thresholds.

Example Exploration: Financial Crises Across Time

Say you want to better understand the occurrence and movement of financial crises across time. Select "GDP at MER" for the country

Figure 3: Mouse-over Network Link Display Example

size, "Financial Crisis (Binary)" for the country color and "Total Trade" for the network. Then, select 1960 for the year, and (without clicking again) begin to scroll down though subsequent years using the down arrow key on your keyboard. In this way, you can quickly see which countries experienced a financial crisis in each year. Some patterns you may notice are:

- Between 1960 and 1980 financial crises were limited to the Global South

- After 1980, more countries in the Global North began to experience crisis, and the US had its first post-1960 crisis in 1988

- Crises occur in geographically contiguous country clusters relatively often (e.g. western South America 1981, Scandanavia 1991, Eastern Europe 1992, east and southeast Asia 1997 and 1998)

- When countries with large economies are involved in a crisis, it can affect a region and/or trading partners in subsequent years; this cascading effect can be seen in the map view and in the bar graph displayed at the bottom of the page (e.g. Asian financial crisis with Japan as the epicenter in 1996 and 1997 and the Global Financial Crisis with the US and UK as epicenters in 2007-2009)

Defining the Variables

The different categories of relevant indicators are listed below, with a justification for their inclusion in the EconDash visualization.

Dependent Variable:Types of Crises

The dependent variable is defined as an economic crisis that occurs as a result of strictly economic phenomena. This excludes economic instability resulting from political instability or natural disasters. Economic crises are classified according to the following IMF data.

The IMF Systemic Banking Crises Database was originally published in 2008 by Luc Laeven and Fabián Valencia, and updated in 2012. The IMF Systemic Banking Crises Database covers 431 crisis events identified from 1970 to 2011, of which 134 are identified as systemic banking crises, 13 borderline systemic banking crises, 218 currency crises, and 66 sovereign debt crises. For the 147 systemic or borderline systemic banking crises, the database also tracks the mixture of policy responses to each of these systemic banking crises. The authors of the database classify each of the crisis events per the following criteria:

Financial Crises 

Financial crises are analyzed as binary variables from the IMF's banking crises database. They observe the occurence of any one of the following types of financial crises:

1. Systemic Banking Crisis
2. Currency Crisis
3. Sovereign Debt Crisis

Systemic Banking Crisis

Systemic banking crises are contingent upon satisfying the following two conditions:

1) Significant signs of financial distress in the banking system (as indicated by significant bank runs, losses in the banking system, and/or bank liquidations)

2) Significant banking policy intervention measures in response to significant losses in the banking system. The first year that both conditions are satisfied is considered the onset year.

The second condition can be met when three of the following six policy intervention measures have been implemented:​

1. Extensive liquidity support - Liquidity support is extensive when the ratio of central bank claims on the financial sector to deposits and foreign liabilities exceeds five percent and more than doubles relative to its pre-crisis level. The authors also included any liquidity support extended directly from the treasury. But liquidity support to subsidiaries of foreign banks is not included in the ratio of the foreign country, only the domestic ratio.
2. Bank restructuring gross costs - Bank restructuring costs are defined as gross fiscal outlays directed to the restructuring of the financial sector. The authors exclude liquidity assistance from the treasury captured by the first intervention to avoid potentially double counting. Bank restructuring costs are considered significant if they compose at least 3% of GDP
3. Significant bank nationalizations - Significant nationalizations are takeovers by the government of systemically important financial institutions and include cases where the government takes a majority stake in the capital of those financial institutions.
4. Significant guarantees put in place - Significant guarantee on bank liabilities indicate that either a full protection of liabilities has been issued or that guarantees have been extended to non-deposit liabilities of banks. However, policy interventions that only target the level of deposit insurance coverage are excluded.
5. Significant asset purchases - Significant asset purchases from financial institutions by the central bank or the treasury exceeding five percent of GDP.
6. Deposit freezes and/or bank holidays - Government halts acccount activity or require bank closure; this action is taken more frequently by emerging economies.

Outside of these criteria, a crisis can be deemed systemic if 1) a country’s banking system exhibits significant losses resulting in a share of nonperforming loans above 20 percent, or bank closures of at least 20 percent of banking system assets; or 2) fiscal restructuring costs of the banking sector are sufficiently high exceeding 5 percent of GDP.

Currency Crisis

Currency crises occur when the national currency experiences a nominal depreciation of the currency against the U.S. dollar of at least 30 percent and is also at least 10 percentage points greater than the rate of depreciation in the year before. The authors use the bilateral dollar exchange rate from the World Economic Outlook database from the IMF. In cases where countries meet the currency criteria for several continuous years, the authors use the first year of each 5-year window to identify the crisis. Using this approach the authors identify 218 currency crises from 1970 to 2011, of which, 10 occur from 2008 to 2011.

Sovereign Debt Crisis and Debt Restructuring Years

Sovereign debt crises occur when countries default on their sovereign debt to private creditors. The authors identify 66 sovereign debt crises using data taken from a Beim and Calomiris 2001 paper, the World Bank, a Sturzenegger and Zettelmeyer 2006 paper, IMF staff reports, and reports from rating agencies. Similarly, the year of debt restructuring is the year a country restructures their debt. It is possible to have multiple crises and debt restructurings in a single year, see Greece 2012.

Independent Variable: Drivers of Crises

The independent variables in this dataset describe countries' internal economic conditions and their networked relationships, i.e. centrality scores. Table 1 lists each independent variable and provides its category, source, and definition. See additional information on data sources below.

Table 1: Variable List

Variable Name	Source Institution(s)	Source Database(s)	Definition
Structural Variables
GDP Growth Rate	Pardee Center & International Monetary Fund (IMF)	International Futures (IFs) & IMF's World Economic Outlook (WEO)	Gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate, percent
GDP at MER	Pardee Center & IMF	IFs & WEO	GDP at Market Exchange Rates (billion USD), 2011 constant prices
GDPPCP	Pardee Center & IMF	IFs & WEO	GDP per capita at Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) (thousand USD), 2011 constant prices
Financial Variables
Centrality Score Ag	Pardee Center, United Nations Trade Statistics (UNTS) & CEPii	UN Comtrade Database (Comtrade) & CEPii's BACI	Centrality of country in the agricultural trade network when the network is calcuated in absolute terms (million USD)
Centrality Score Ag (Percent)	Pardee Center, UNTS, & CEPii	Comtrade & BACI	Centrality of country in the agricultural trade network when the network is calculated in relative terms (as a percent of GDP)
Centrality Score Energy	Pardee Center, UNTS, & CEPii	Comtrade & BACI	Centrality of country in the energy trade network when the network is calcuated in absolute terms (million USD)
Centrality Score Energy (Percent)	Pardee Center, UNTS, & CEPii	Comtrade & BACI	Centrality of country in the energy trade network when the network is calculated in relative terms (as a percent of GDP)
Centrality Score ICT	Pardee Center, UNTS, & CEPii	Comtrade & BACI	Centrality of country in the ICT trade network when the network is calcuated in absolute terms (million USD)
Centrality Score ICT (Percent)	Pardee Center, UNTS, & CEPii	Comtrade & BACI	Centrality of country in the energy trade network when the network is calculated in relative terms (as a percent of GDP)
Centrality Score Manufacturing	Pardee Center, UNTS, & CEPii	Comtrade & BACI	Centrality of country in the manufacturing trade network when the network is calcuated in absolute terms (million USD)
Centrality Score Manufacturing (Percent)	Pardee Center, UNTS, & CEPii	Comtrade & BACI	Centrality of country in the manufacturing trade network when the network is calculated in relative terms (as a percent of GDP)
Centrality Score Materials	Pardee Center, UNTS, & CEPii	Comtrade & BACI	Centrality of country in the materials trade network when the network is calcuated in absolute terms (million USD)
Centrality Score Materials (Percent)	Pardee Center, UNTS, & CEPii	Comtrade & BACI	Centrality of country in the materials trade network when the network is calculated in relative terms (as a percent of GDP)
Centrality Score Services	Pardee Center & UNTS	Comtrade & UN Service Trade Statistics Database	Centrality of country in the services trade network when the network is calcuated in absolute terms (million USD)
Centrality Score Services (Percent)	Pardee Center & UNTS	Comtrade & UN Service Trade Statistics Database	Centrality of country in the services trade network when the network is calculated in relative terms (as a percent of GDP)
Centrality Score Total	Pardee Center, UNTS, & CEPii	Comtrade, BACI, & UN Service Trade Statistics Database	Centrality of country in the total trade network when the network is calcuated in absolute terms (million USD)
Centrality Score Total (Percent)	Pardee Center, UNTS, & CEPii	Comtrade, BACI, & UN Service Trade Statistics Database	Centrality of country in the total trade network when the network is calculated in relative terms (as a percent of GDP)
Network Variables
Total Trade as a Percent of GDP	Pardee Center, UNTS, & CEPii	Comtrade, BACI, & UN Service Trade Statistics Database	Total trade as a percent of the partner country's GDP
Total Energy Trade	Pardee Center, UNTS, & CEPii	Comtrade & BACI	Total bilateral energy trade in millions of USD
Total ICT Trade	Pardee Center, UNTS, & CEPii	Comtrade & BACI	Total bilateral ICT trade in millions of USD
Total Manufacturing Trade	Pardee Center, UNTS, & CEPii	Comtrade & BACI	Total bilateral manufacturing trade in millions of USD
Total Materials Trade	Pardee Center, UNTS, & CEPii	Comtrade & BACI	Total bilateral materials trade in millions of USD
Total Services Trade	Pardee Center & UNTS	Comtrade & UN Service Trade Statistics Database	Total bilateral services trade in millions of USD
Total Agricultural Trade	Pardee Center, UNTS, & CEPii	Comtrade & BACI	Total bilateral agricultural trade in millions of USD
Total Trade	Pardee Center, UNTS, & CEPii	Comtrade & BACI	Total bilateral trade in millions of USD
Total Energy Trade as a Percent of GDP	Pardee Center, UNTS, & CEPii	Comtrade & BACI	Total energy trade as a percent of the partner country's GDP
Total ICT Trade as a Percent of GDP	Pardee Center, UNTS, & CEPii	Comtrade & BACI	Total ICT trade as a percent of the partner country's GDP
Total Manufacturing Trade as a Percent of GDP	Pardee Center, UNTS, & CEPii	Comtrade & BACI	Total manufacturing trade as a percent of the partner country's GDP
Total Materials Trade as a Percent of GDP	Pardee Center, UNTS, & CEPii	Comtrade & BACI	Total materials trade as a percent of the partner country's GDP
Total Services Trade as a Percent of GDP	Pardee Center & UNTS	Comtrade & UN Service Trade Statistics Database	Total services trade as a percent of the partner country's GDP
Total Agricultural Trade as a Percent of GDP	Pardee Center, UNTS, & CEPii	Comtrade & BACI	Total agricultural trade as a percent of the partner country's GDP

Data Sources

All dyadic trade data comes from COMTRADE and UN Trade Statistics. CEPII cleans the COMTRADE data, so data has been pulled from there. CEPII does not have dyadic trade data for the services sector, so data from UN Trade Statistics has been blended with the CEPII data to get a complete trade balance. CEPii data 

Centrality Scores

Centrality is defined along the following dimensions:

1. Reach- Ability of entity to reach other vertices
2. Flow-Quantity/ weight of walks passing through entity
3. Vitality- Effect of removing entity from network
4. Feedback- A recursive function of alter centralities

Eigenvector centrality is defined as the centrality of each vertex being proportional to the sum of the centralities of its neighbor. The basic idea behind eigenvector centrality is that a central actor is connected to other central actors. In EconDash, eigenvector centrality is used to analyze centrality of a country in a trade network in a particular year. The following dyadic trade data is used to analyze bilateral trade levels between countries in the following sectors. Each sector is analyzed as percent of partner country's GDP as well as total intrasector trade in millions of US dollars:

1. Energy
2. Manufacturing
3. Information and Communication Technology
4. Materials
5. Services
6. Agriculture
7. Total Trade