China Sub-Regional June 2017 Consolidation: Difference between revisions

From Pardee Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 77: Line 77:


It was difficult to find provincial forecasts on China, but there was one paper that was found in Mandarin that had provincial population forecasts for China's provinces. The paper from Nanjing University compared its forecasts to several other population forecasting models of China and this data was used to compare the IFs provincial model to. As was previously stated, Nanjing University's model  has a steeper slope and forecasts population to continue to rise at the same rate, which all other forecasting models do not. This suggests that it might not be as good of a model as the others, but it gives some information about our forecasts. 
It was difficult to find provincial forecasts on China, but there was one paper that was found in Mandarin that had provincial population forecasts for China's provinces. The paper from Nanjing University compared its forecasts to several other population forecasting models of China and this data was used to compare the IFs provincial model to. As was previously stated, Nanjing University's model  has a steeper slope and forecasts population to continue to rise at the same rate, which all other forecasting models do not. This suggests that it might not be as good of a model as the others, but it gives some information about our forecasts. 
=== Migration ===
Migration rates for China's provinces are not available, nor are forecasts of China's migration rates. This means that the model is without migration which is problematic because migration is clearly a salient issue that is shaping provincial populations. For instance, Beijing's population pyramid shows a population that has been transformed by migration. 


=== Anhui ===
=== Anhui ===
Line 138: Line 142:
=== Hunan ===
=== Hunan ===


[[File:ChinaHunanPop v728.png|900px]]
[[File:ChinaHunanPop v728.png|900px|ChinaHunanPop v728.png]]


=== Jiangsu ===
=== Jiangsu ===

Revision as of 18:15, 22 June 2017

Overview

China's sub-regional model has a total of 63 preprocessor series. Although there are 652 preprocessor series in the IFs model, there are many that are not applicable to sub-regional models or do not significantly impact forecasts; only 355 preprocessor series are sought for sub-regionalization. Thus China's sub-regional model has nearly 18% coverage at this point. There are a 29 preprocessor series that have been identified that could be pulled into the model. If this data was to be pulled the the total coverage of the model would increase to nearly 26%. 

Below is a table that shows the module coverage for the China sub-regional model. Population has the most coverage, but this is also the fewest number of preprocessor series. The economy module has the second highest coverage, which is good. Population and Economy have  the greatest impact on the model's overall behavior and coverage in these modules is important. Health and education are areas of weakness for the China sub-regional model. In part the weakness is driven by the large number of series in those modules. There is more education data available that could be brought into the model, but some of the data requires historical age-sex cohorts to calculate rates with the data. Health has low coverage because there is not a lot of health data that is available for free and in English. It appears that much of China's health data is proprietary and not publicly available, but there may be alternative sources available if a researcher searched in Mandarin. 

IFs Module Preprocessor Series Pulled Total Preprocessor Series Module Coverage
Population 7 8 87.5%
Economy 24 55 43.6%
Health 5 57 8.8%
Education 8 91 8.8%
Agriculture 11 36 30.6%
Energy 7 66 10.6%
Infrastructure 1 21 4.8%
Environment 0 9 0.0%
Socio-Political
0 12 0.0%
Total 63 355 17.7%
Potential Series 92 355 25.9%

Population

China's Population

The provincial model's population for China was rolled up in IFs and compared to other population forecasts for China, as shown below. It is clear that the population forecast from the sum of the provinces (IFs_WB) is in line with other forecasting models. Nanjing University's forecasting model is the most off from the rest of the forecasts, where population growth is forecast to continue to rise. 

ChinaPopVet 728.png

It was difficult to find provincial forecasts on China, but there was one paper that was found in Mandarin that had provincial population forecasts for China's provinces. The paper from Nanjing University compared its forecasts to several other population forecasting models of China and this data was used to compare the IFs provincial model to. As was previously stated, Nanjing University's model  has a steeper slope and forecasts population to continue to rise at the same rate, which all other forecasting models do not. This suggests that it might not be as good of a model as the others, but it gives some information about our forecasts. 

Migration

Migration rates for China's provinces are not available, nor are forecasts of China's migration rates. This means that the model is without migration which is problematic because migration is clearly a salient issue that is shaping provincial populations. For instance, Beijing's population pyramid shows a population that has been transformed by migration. 

Anhui

Anhui Population

Both model's historical data looks strange for Anhui, this is seen throughout the provinces and is in part due to the changing definitions of boundaries throughout China. However, the shifts do not coincide perfectly, it looks like Nanjing University's data is lagged. Because the paper is in Mandarin there is not any certainty that this is true. 

Beijing

ChinaBeijingPop v728.png

Beijing has a large jump in the late 2000s in the World Bank data. Nanjing University's data decreases when the World Bank data is increasing in the late 2000s, which looks odd and perhaps is another sign that the data is lagged.

Chongqing

ChinaChongqingPop v728.png

The World Bank data was interpolated in the model which fills the population back to 1960 smoothly. In reality the municipality did not bifurcate from Sichuan until 1997 and its borders were redefined several times between 1997 and 2008. Thus Nanjing University's historical data's strange behavior makes sense, but the forecasts look too high. 

Gansu

ChinaGansuPop v728.png

Guangdong

ChinaGuangdongPop v728.png

Guizhou

ChinaGuizhouPop v728.png

Guangxi

ChinaGuangxiPopv728.png

Fujian

ChinaFujianPop v728.png

Hainan

ChinaHainanPop v728.png

Hebei

ChinaHebeiPop v728.png

Heilongjiang

ChinaHeilongjiangPop v728.png

Henan

ChinaHenanPopVet v728.png

Hubei

RTENOTITLE

Hunan

ChinaHunanPop v728.png

Jiangsu

ChinaJiangsuPop v728.png

Jiangxi

ChinaJiangxiPop v728.png

Jilin

ChinaJilinPop v728.png

Liaoning

ChinaLiaoningPop v728.png

Nei Mongol

ChinaNeiMongolPop v728.png

Ningxia

ChinaNingxiaPop v728.png

Qinghai

ChinaQinghaiPop v728.png

Shaanxi

ChinaShaanxiPop v728.png

Shandong

ChinaShandongPop v728.png

Shanghai

ChinaShanghaiPop v728.png

Shanxi

ChinaJiangxiPop v728.png

Sichuan

ChinaSichuanPop v728.png

Tianjin

ChinaTianjinPop v728.png

Tibet

ChinaTibetPop v728.png

Xinjiang

ChinaXinjiangPop v728.png

Yunnan

ChinaYunnanPop v728.png

Zhejiang

ChinaZhejiangPop v728.png

China's Crude Birth Rates

CBRs in the provincial model are quite close to the 186 model. There is a greater difference in the historical data than in the forecasts, but overall the two models are quite close. 

ChinaCBR v728.png

China's Crude Death Rates

Like CBRs, CDRs are quite close in the two models. There is a greater difference towards the end of the forecasts after 2065. 

ChinaCDR v728.png

China's Migration Rates

Migration rates that have been included in the model are historical and were found in a paper[1] that estimates sub-national migration in China. Chinese intranational migration has proven to be a difficult measure because there is a significant amount of illegal migration from rural areas to urban areas. 

There is only historical data available. Therefore the migration rates do not impact the forecasts because the model does not endogenously calculate migration forecasts. 

The two models appear to be different historically, but it should be noted that both models' migration rates are almost zero for all years. The difference between them is small in total, but the magnitude appears to be large. 

ChinaMigRate v728.png

China's Total Fertility Rates

There is only a single year of historical data for provincial TFR in China and unfortunately the data is from 2000, making this series outdated. For all provinces except Beijing, the 2000 historical data point is the same as the 2014 data point when the model initializes. Due to the outdated data being used for model initialization the provincial model's forecasts of TFR are slightly lower than the 186 model initially.

ChinaTFR v728.png

It is also important to note that provinces such as Beijing are outliers compared to the rest of the world due to the impact of the One Child Policy in China's urban areas. Unlike the rest of the world where TFR is forecast to decline to 1.9 and then remain at that level throughout the end of the time horizon, most provinces are forecast to have TFR increase to 1.9 and then remain at that rate through the end of the time horizon. Only Guizhou, Tibet, and Yunnan provinces have TFR above 1.9 historically that are forecast to decline to 1.9. 

There are no known forecasts to compare the provincial forecasts for TFR with. The model's behavior looks good and without an available data source to update the historical data there is nothing that can be reasonably done to get the provincial model to match the 186 version. 

China's Life Expectancy

Life expectancy in China's provincial model is in line with the 186 model historically and through the end of the time horizon in the forecasts. Male life expectancy is slightly lower in the provincial model than in the 186 model, but female life expectancy and total life expectancy are nearly identical in the two models. 

Total Life Expectancy 

ChinaLifExp v728.png

Life Expectancy Female

ChinaLifeExpFemale v728.png

Life Expectancy Male

ChinaLifeExpMale v728.png

Economy

China's GDP

Provincial GDP is significantly greater than the 186-model's GDP for most of the forecast years. 

ChinaGDP v728.png

China's GDP per Capita

China's GDP per capita in the provincial model is significantly greater than the GDP. This is expected because the total population is quite close in both models, whereas, the GDP is greater. 

ChinaGDPPC v728.png

Value Added

Value added in all sectors are relatively close in both models, but it is slightly lower in the provincial model overall. The disparity between the two model's GDP does not appear to be driven by value added. 

Agriculture

The provincial model has higher value added in agriculture historically, but is forecast to have slightly lower value added in the future. 

ChinaAgVadd v728.png

Energy

Value added in energy is forecast to be lower in the provincial model until around 2075 when the two models are forecast to be about the same. 

ChinaEnVadd v728.png

Materials

Value added in materials is forecast to be lower in the provincial model by about a percentage point for all years. 

ChinaMatVadd v728.png

Manufacturing

Manufacturing value added is relatively close in both models, with the provincial model being slightly greater. 

ChinaManufacturingVAdd v728.png

Services

The two models are close historically and are forecast to be identical after 2035. 

ChinaSerVadd v728.png

ICT

ICT forecasts are nearly identical. 

ChinaICTVadd v728.png

MultiFactor Productivity

Multifactor productivity is significantly larger in the provincial model than in the 186-model. This is the likely culprit for what is driving the disparity between the two model's GDP forecasts. 

Agriculture

The provincial model is slightly lower than the 186-model until around 2040. After 2040, the provincial model is greater than the 186-model by an increasing margin. 

ChinaMFPAg v728.png

Energy

Multifactor productivity in energy is much greater in the provincial model.

ChinaMFPEn v728.png

Materials

Multifactor productivity in materials is much greater in the provincial model than in the 186-model. 

ChinaMFPMat v728.png

Manufacturing

The provincial model has much greater multifactor productivity in manufacturing than the 186-model. 

ChinaMFPManufactures v728.png

Services

Multifactor productivity is much greater in the provincial model. 

ChinaMFPser v728.png

ICT

Multifactor productivity is significantly greater in the provincial model. 

ChinaMFPICT v728.png

GDS

Government spending is a key driver in the model and it directly impacts multifactor productivity, which appears to be off. 

Military

Military spending is greater in the provincial model, why this is occurring is not clear because there is not any historical data for this series. 

ChinaGDSMil v728.png

Education

The provincial model is initially greater than the 186-model and after 2055 the provincial model is lower. There is historical data in the provincial model for this series. 

ChinaGDSEd v728.png

Health

The two models are initially close together, but over time the provincial model becomes greater than the 186-model by an increasing margin. There is historical data for this series. 

ChinaGDSHealth v728.png

Research and Development

There is more investment in research and development in the provincial model, but the total amount is very small in both models. This means that the marginal difference is small, but the magnitude of difference is significant. There is historical provincial data for this series. 

ChinaGDSR&D v728.png

Infrastructure

Infrastructure spending is close in the two models. There is not any historical provincial data for this series. 

ChinaGDSInfra v728.png

InfraOther

The provincial model has more InfraOther spending than the 186-model. 

ChinaGDSInfraOther v728.png

Other

Other spending is significantly greater in the provincial model. 

ChinaGDSOth v728.png

  1. Kam Wing Chan, Forthcoming in; The Encyclopedia of Global Migration, edited by Immanuel Ness (Blackwell Publishing, 2017).